Advanced11 min
Debugging Production Agents
Debug production AI agents systematically: trace analysis through the full pipeline, log correlation from user complaint to specific LLM call, handling common production failures (timeouts, context overflow, tool errors), and structured post-mortems for AI incidents.
Quick Reference
- →Trace analysis: follow a single request through user input → routing → retrieval → LLM call → tool calls → response
- →Log correlation: user complaint → trace ID → specific LLM call → prompt and response that caused the issue
- →Top 3 production failures: timeout cascades (38%), context window overflow (25%), tool permission errors (18%)
- →Capture-and-replay: record production inputs + state to reproduce issues in a local environment
- →Post-mortem template: timeline, root cause, contributing factors, action items, eval suite additions
Trace Analysis: Following a Request End-to-End
Agent traces are not like API traces
A traditional API trace follows a linear path: request → handler → database → response. An agent trace is a graph: request → router → retrieval → LLM call → tool decision → tool execution → second LLM call → response. Multiple LLM calls, branching tool paths, and retry loops make agent traces fundamentally more complex.
Structured trace capture for agent pipelines
- ▸Every span should capture: operation name, input/output (truncated), latency, tokens used, and any errors
- ▸Parent-child span relationships let you visualize the trace as a tree (e.g., Jaeger, LangSmith)
- ▸Store traces for at least 30 days — production issues are often reported days after they occur
- ▸Truncate input/output to 2KB per span to avoid exploding storage costs on long conversations